Friday, December 11, 2009

ARE YOU SUFFERING FROM A SEVERE PRISON-MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX?

MESSAGE TO THE HISTORY CHANNEL: i have always gotten the distinct feeling that the history channel is really just a long arm of the US government, seemingly reacting to the daily events with pre-packaged propaganda of sorts to further a pre-packaged agenda - and now that we are starting another military incursion, the history channel seems to be working hard once again to glorify either gang violence (perhaps to cause it's uprise once again and/or cause much needed 'illuminati' chaos') and/or military violence as the prison/military industrial complex kicks back into high gear once again...

yes; republican eras and/or gang violence seem to go hand in hand as gangs practice on the street what the military wants them to do overseas > gangs are largely due to unemployment and/or class warfare waged by republican eras to decimate and/or destroy the bridge of the middle class, to keep poor people poor and make rich people richer; therefore ensuring more low income-related gang violence in the future to fill the ranks of the military, and/or fill prisons for cheap labor; etc etc etc - in fact; my neighbor's son was in a gang and got caught; they gave him two choices; go to prison; or go into the military - he is now a high ranking marines officer who has been on several missions to iraq and afghanistan...

'ONE MUST BE AWARE OF THE WISDOM AND STRENGTH THAT IS IN THEM
IF THEIR UNDERSTANDING IS TO BE EXPANDED' - VAUVENARGUES

Monday, November 16, 2009

VIOLENT ASEXUAL AMERICA!

WHY SHOULD ANYONE RECEIVE LIFE IN PRISON FOR HAVING ALLEGED SEX WHEN A COP CAN SHOOT SOMEBODY AND RECEIVE A PAID VACATION? > THAT'S RIGHT!; IT'S TIME TO RUN NAKED AND AMOK! -- i recently heard about a 42 year old man who will be receiving a life sentence for ALLEGEDLY (see: hearsay evidence) molesting a teenage girl a few years back -- QUESTION: why did the person who DEFINITELY killed my brother in a head-on collision, receive only a year and a half in jail, and another license to kill shortly after release? ANSWER: because the US government is one of the most violent entites on the face of the planet (go to: http://misinformation.net) and also quite purposely one of the least sexual entities as well (why? because sex = increased population, while violence = depopulation > click here) -- it clearly does not matter what the american people vote and/or fight for and/or want; [civil rights; sexual freedom; medical marijuana and/or deepened democracy, etc etc etc] much like the chinese government; the US government will inevitably come along and squash our valiant, collective efforts -- THE BOTTOM LINE: we cannot have it both ways; as whenever the US government attempts to 'eradicate' sex; increased violence inevitably appears; but somehow i get the feeling our violent, asexual US government wouldn't have it any other way; as this in a sense provides a much-needed smokescreen for the legitimization of their own military and/or police violence - read more @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/ > note: violence does not really matter unless it is wielded against a government 'official'; a teenage girl, a minority; and/or someone else who is considered to be part of a 'protected class' [see: discrimination -- example: men supposedly cannot be raped by a woman; even though many women often act like madoff]; as the US government clearly considers these lives to be more important than any others...

> while the US government loves to shame various individuals through use of the media; the truth is: the US government causes more pain and suffering than any other entity on the face of this planet - PERIOD.

while not all modern youths abstain from sex; attempting to depopulate and/or desexualize teens during their sexual prime is not only stupid, but very dangerous as well, as this is nothing more than an accident waiting to happen > not only can abstaining from sex (and/or 'self-stimulation') during your teen years lead to erectile dysfunction later in life (USE IT OR LOSE IT! > viagra etc); but it also shuts off an important energy valve - and blocking sexual energy is precisely what is causing increased youth violence; especially amongst testosterone-driven young men who are ripe for military duty, and perhaps this is why our government is attempting to forcefully shut off the sex valve in our youth; to purposefully inculcate violence and/or increase military recruitment? -- the fact is: women and/or girls often give men and/or boys a much needed self-education that can be severely lacking in a purposefully desexualized society...

QUESTION: why would the US government not allow janet jacksons' breast on TV, yet allow young children to see people getting their heads blown off nightly on network TV? - ANSWER: because even though a mere breast does not constitute sex - it does to the US government; so that's that - IT'S THE SIMPLE DEPOPULATION EQUATION - SO DO THE MATH: SEX and /or SEXY = MORE HUMANS while VIOLENCE and/or WAR = LESS HUMANS and LESS HUMANS = DEPOPULATION - and now with the synthetic biological agent AIDS; SEX = DEPOPULATION as well...

compassion is the new radicalism - HH the dalai lama

Monday, September 28, 2009

SEX! SEX! SEX!

EMAIL TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DA: we all know many vietnam veterans eventually admitted to raping women and children while pillaging villages in vietnam, before burning them down with flame throwers; so what is going on here? -- are vietnamese teens considered not as important as american teens, or what? -- many years ago i was out working when i went into a water filtration store and talked to a guy who admitted to raping women and children before burning down villages in vietnam!? -- so are all of these criminal veterans going to run free; or what? -- you know; why do people (for instance) get medals for killing iraqis overseas; while some poor high school teacher who was seduced by his student in a case of loving consentual sex is forced to live out in the woods and be treated less than human? -- isn't that double jeopardy and/or cruel and unusual punishment? -- you know it is; we have just entered a temporal era of severe unconstitutional behavior on the part of government, forever feeding the slow erosion of rights here in america -- sincerely > lik roper -- note: with liberty and justice for some?

Monday, July 06, 2009

MICHAEL JACKSONS' CHARACTER ASSASSINATION

--- On Mon, 7/6/09, Lik Roper wrote: From: Lik Roper / Subject: MICHAEL JACKSON'S CHARACTER ASSASSINATION / To: CNN@cnn.com, primenews@cnn.com talkback@cnn.com

i think the mainstream media is now simply making up for colluding with our evil US government in the assassination of michael jackson's character, which likely led to his untimely death -- the original pedo-media circus was based upon michael's popularity and aimed at destroying that same popularity, but this clearly did not work -- i have been the target of the same kind of government-sponsored character assassination, so i know all about this kind of stuff; anyone who is authoritative and/or popular and/or anyone who others look to for answers and/or anyone who uses their power to speak truth to power can expect to be a target of political retaliation [let's face it; MJ's dedication to improving race relations, along with his penchant for peace and love likely put him at major odds with an 'illuminati' who loves to divide us and/or control the influential/peaceful folks amongst us]...
and now we have the mainstream media making up for its' obvious mistake by having positive coverage of MJ's untimely death...
THE BOTTOM LINE: as for all the republicans who hate michael jackson; it is much more evil to shoot cluster bombs at children in foreign countries [slaughtering innocence and/or innocents] than it is to [allegedly] fondle their buttocks and/or genitals, is it not? -- and now because of the michael jackson fiasco, i avoid children like the plague, so does CNN consider this a positive step in the right direction for our [divisive] society and/or our children, or what? -- it used to take a village to raise a child (hillary); but now that same village is under suspicion -- TODAY'S LESSON: unless they can dance and sing; letting morons run society based upon what is essentially and/or usually considered 'inadmissable hearsay evidence' is and always will be; a bad idea...

Friday, June 12, 2009

DEEPENED DEMOCRACY IS A BITCH NAMED 'LADY LIBERTY'

> On Friday 6/12/09 -- Lone Wolf Rebel Leader Lik Roper > wrote: From: Lik Roper -- Subject: IT'S TIME TO SUPPORT DEEPENED DEMOCRACY -- To: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

i hear all you folks down at the DOJ don't like deepened democracy ~ and/or you also have a problem with the FACT that marijuana has been legalized in several states -- so why don't you go work for the CCP, or something? they just might like your heavy-handed style!

> DEEPENED DEMOCRACY IS A BITCH NAMED 'LADY LIBERTY'! -- 'JUST LET GO' MOM AND DAD! -- WE ARE IN CONTROL, BABY! > hmmm...how should i say this? -- i really hate to break it to you all this way; but in voting in obama we also voted in bottom-up control, meaning THE PEOPLE (and/or THE VOTERS) are now 'in control' of this mess you all created, so i suppose it's good to see at least a few judges finally getting this point...

> i know this sounds a bit cliche DOJ; but the government is not our parents, so it is high time to 'just let go' and let us all collectively determine our fates as our founding fathers so desired; by letting the freedom bell ring loudly for all across this vast planet to hear! -- let us set a new example of self-governance which thinks outside the bun > let us think ourselves into a whole new enchilada w/salsa; extra cheese; guacamole; and tasty, lightly grilled marinated chicken which is so good after smoking cannabis sativa!...

> and i also know at least some of you other congressional folks out there think this latest tobacco bill is leading us all to some back door way of allowing you all to regulate marijuana as well; but you all better think again; because if THE PEOPLE want marijuana to be regulated; it will be regulated, otherwise it will not be -- period.

the marijuana cat is now officially out of the bag, and you all couldn't get her back in if you tried until the end of time -- in fact; one local pot club is selling about 100+ clones per day (tiny marijuana plants to be grown LEGALLY indoors and/or outdoors) and there is not a thing all of you backwards government folks could do about it, even if you wanted to! besides; how are you going to go about regulating pot people grow in their homes? you know; the same pot that ends up in the clubs? you aren't; that's how! > ps - just making you all aware of THE FACTS ahead of time so you don't get any funny ideas about mandating the production of SHITTY POT! -- thanks but no thanks! -- sincerley, LIK ROPER
MESSAGE TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA: changing bong water after every hit removes roughly 99 percent of the carcinogens from pot smoke. - so let us instead talk about the roughly 70,000+ known carcinogenic chemicals used by the semicondutor industry which lurk in our groundwater; carcinogenic chemicals which NO ONE has any choice in being exposed to -- go to: http://likroper.com/SUPERFUND.html + http://likroper.com/SUPERFUND2.html - MESSAGE TO THE UNITED NATIONS: DOES THE U.N. WANT PEACE ON EARTH, OR NOT?! - MESSAGE TO LOU DOBBS OF CNN: FUCK YOU, YOU OLD FART!

Thursday, March 26, 2009

HIGH SKILLED, HIGH PAYING JOBS vs OUTSOURCING

MESSAGE TO PRESIDENT OBAMA: creating only high-skilled, high paying pobs will only create class warfare like the clinton's created during the 1990s here in the silicon valley; gentrifying those who do not have those elite skills, and therefore opening a HUGE gap between the rich and poor, and ultimately leaving almost everyone in the dust at the fall of the internet boom -- medicinal marijuana's GREEN INDUSTRY is open to all people and can provide steady income with relatively little training; and it is not going away any time soon, that is unless our government wants a little bit of non-violent revolution on their hands [oops; you've already got one!]...
i don't get mad very often, but here goes: it's time to get the fuck out of the way of the medicinal marijuana industry and let DEEPENED DEMOCRACY take hold once and literally FOR ALL, obama! > PS - other than that; legalizing marijuana is all about SETTING FREE all the men and/or women (often black and/or minorities) who have suffered from prosecutorial misconduct and/or somehow ended up locked in a 10"x10" cell for merely possessing a joint of marijuana in some third world country like, oh let's say the state of mississippi, for instance...
MESSAGE TO HILLARY CLINTON: THANK GOD (ME) YOU'RE NOT PRESIDENT! i think you've been hanging around with the leaders of china a bit too much lately lady; it's high time to get the fuck out of the way of DEEPENED DEMOCRACY and allow the will of the people to take hold once and literally; FOR ALL -- you've always been a stinking god damn republicrat, and those colors showed rather brightly yesterday -- it's obvious the US cannot stop the illegal drug trade (after too many years of trying); and criminalizing drugs only fills all the wrong banks accounts; so it's seems obvious to pick one pre-existing cash crop in mexico (marijuana) and allow legal free trade between our countries AS LONG AS THE FINISHED PRODUCT IS GROWN ORGANICALLY, and making sure future profits land in the hands of good people -- some people (who will remain anonymous) swear by mexican weed, so since there is clearly a strong demand for this MEDICINE (the government makes us all sick) in this fine country, it really doesn't matter whether you're eternally condesceding, bitchy ass agrees with all of us or not, hillary -- THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN; IT IS HIGH TIME TO GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY AND ALLOW DEEPENED DEMOCRACY TO TAKE HOLD, ONCE AND LITERALLY FOR ALL! -- TO HELL WITH THE PRISON/MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX! -- STOP BEATING THE DRUMS OF WAR AND START TALKING WORDS OF PEACE; LEGALIZE MARIJUANA!
QUESTION: DO YOU ALL WANT TO BOOST THE ECONOMY HERE IN AMERICA AND ACROSS THE BORDER WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY STOPPING THE DRUG WAR IN MEXICO, OR NOT?
IT'S TIME TO START THINKING OUTSIDE THE BUN...

ORIGINS OF THE OVERCLASS - The wealthy have always used many methods to accumulate wealth, but it was not until the mid-1970s that these methods coalesced into a superbly organized, cohesive and efficient machine. After 1975, it became greater than the sum of its parts, a smooth flowing organization of advocacy groups, lobbyists, think tanks, conservative foundations, and PR firms that hurtled the richest 1 percent into the stratosphere - The origins of this machine, interestingly enough, can be traced back to the CIA. This is not to say the machine is a formal CIA operation, complete with code name and signed documents. (Although such evidence may yet surface — and previously unthinkable domestic operations such as MK-ULTRA, CHAOS and MOCKINGBIRD show this to be a distinct possibility.) But what we do know already indicts the CIA strongly enough. Its principle creators were Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon, Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, William F. Buckley, Jr., the Rockefeller family, and more. Almost all the machine's creators had CIA backgrounds - During the 1970s, these men would take the propaganda and operational techniques they had learned in the Cold War and apply them to the Class War. Therefore it is no surprise that the American version of the machine bears an uncanny resemblance to the foreign versions designed to fight communism. The CIA's expert and comprehensive organization of the business class would succeed beyond their wildest dreams. In 1975, the richest 1 percent owned 22 percent of America’s wealth. By 1992, they would nearly double that, to 42 percent — the highest level of inequality in the 20th century - How did this alliance start? go to: http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Overclass.htm + THE CIA CHALLENGE http://www.metroactive.com/metro/01.28.09/cover-cia-0904.html

QUESTION: why would the US government fail to punish those who tortured and/or sexually abused people at CIA prisons, while continuing to punish those who eased pain and suffering with medical marijuana?

Friday, February 20, 2009

VIOLENCE ON TELEVISION

On 2/19/09 - Lik Roper wrote: From: Lik Roper Subject: VIOLENCE ON TELEVISION -- To: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov -- Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 9:33 AM > i was raised by parents who purposefully avoided gory movies so we would grow up to be well-adjusted -- so why can we all see blood and guts on TV every day on the HISTORY CHANNEL, but not female breasts etc on TV? -- is this some clever way to radicalize our populace and increase military recruitment, or what?
LRE NOTE: 30 sep 2006 / after seeing roughly 10 people get their heads blown off with handguns on network television recently, i had a revelation; the US government allows violence on TV while prohibiting sex; a) as a tool of depopulation - see AIDS document - and b) as way to legitimize their own violent acts -- QUESTION: why would the government not allow janet jacksons' breast on TV, yet allow young children to see people getting their heads blown off nightly on network TV? - ANSWER: because even though a mere breast does not constitute sex - it does to the bush administration; so that's that - IT'S THE SIMPLE DEPOPULATION EQUATION - SO DO THE MATH: SEX and /or SEXY = MORE HUMANS while VIOLENCE and/or WAR = LESS HUMANS and LESS HUMANS = DEPOPULATION - and now with the synthetic biological agent AIDS; SEX = DEPOPULATION as well...
interesting fact: psychological testing is required for those who are a harm to themselves or others; so is american society mentally ill and/or do war supporters need psychological testing?...